Legal Opinion
CenTra, Inc. v. Estrin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 15, 2008No. 07-1680PublishedCited by 192 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
The Detroit International Bridge Company (“DIBC”) and its Michigan-based parent CenTra, Inc. (collectively “Cen-Tra”), believed that more divided them from Windsor, Ontario than united them. For one thing, the Detroit River separates Windsor from Michigan. For another, Windsor and CenTra disagreed as to the future of the Ambassador Bridge, the Cen-Tra-owned bridge that spans the Detroit River; while CenTra sought to add a second span to the bridge, Windsor wanted to stop that expansion. Yet CenTra was wrong in concluding that more divided than united.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Donald Bennett v. City of EastpointeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by192 opinions
- Alspaugh v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Federal Trade Commission v. E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Peggy Blizzard v. Marion Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Rachel v. TrouttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Johnson v. Nextel Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.