Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2014No. 13-4169PublishedCited by 321 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) filed a complaint against Defendants E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc. (“E.M.A.”), 1 UC Inc. (“First United”), New Life Financial Solutions, Inc. (“New Life”), four Canadian corporations, 1 Daniel Michaels, James Benhaim, Phillip Hee Min Kwon, Joseph Shamolian, and Nissim N. Ohayon, 2 alleging violations of § 5(a) the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 45(a); the Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”), 16 C.F.R. Part 310; and the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule (“MARS Rule”), 12 C.F.R. Part 1015. After the district…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by321 opinions
- Paterek v. Village of Armada, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- William Tennial v. United Parcel Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Andrea Miller v. Woodston MaddoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Jane Doe v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Temujin Kensu v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
316 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.