Legal Opinion

Walt v. Walt

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Shelby County.— F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court. '

The first question to be determined is whether Mary L. Walt is entitled to the 248 acres of land described in the pleadings, as against the heirs of her deceased husband.

We are of the opinion that she is so entitled.

This land was inherited by her from her father, Green B. Bateman. On the 7th day of January, 1861, her husband, James R. Walt, relinquished to her all of his interest in it, and settled it upon her to her sole and separate use.

On January 3, 1872, the husband and wife joined in a deed to W. P. York and W. S. Noblin; and they on the same day…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. White v. FulghumTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Garner v. GravesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Briscoe v. VaughnTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Loftis v. LoftisTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Poindexter v. RawlingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Winters v. MarchTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Patton v. HardisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API