Legal Opinion

Poindexter v. Rawlings

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM SEVIER. Appeal from Chancery Court of Sevier County. J NO. P. SMITH, Oil.

1Opinion of the CourtOat.dweix, J.

Tins is a bill to collect balance of purchase money for land, and to enforce the vendor’s equity.

In 1883 the complainant, Martha A. Poindexter, sold and conveyed a tract of land in Sevier County to the defendants. A. P. Rawlings and his wife, Mary S. Rawlings, for the consideration of $2,500; onet-half thereof being paid in cash, and the other half being covered by three notes of A. P. Rawlings, maturing in 1885, 1886, and 1887, respectively. Upon the maturity and payment of the first note, in 1885, A. P. Rawlings returned the original deed to the vendor, and she, at his request, executed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Robinson v. StormTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. SavageNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Faulkner v. RamseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lawman v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hayes v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Jones v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API