Legal Opinion

City of Sacramento v. Swanston

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1915No. Civ. No. 1397PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The action is in eminent domain for the condemnation of certain lands belonging to the defendants.

The jury assessed the damages accruing to the lands described in the complaint by reason of the taking thereof for the purposes of the plaintiff, and in due time after the verdict so rendered and entered the court, upon its findings of fact and conclusions of law, entered judgment of condemnation in the amount of damages admeasured by the jury.

The plaintiff having failed, within thirty days after the final judgment of condemnation, to pay the amount at which the damages as to the defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Durkee v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. People ex rel. Smith v. Judge of the Twelfth DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Superior Wheeler Cake Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Mobile Housing Board v. CrossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Nobuo OtsukaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ludolph v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. California Federation of Teachers v. Oxnard Elementary SchoolsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API