Legal Opinion
Mobile Housing Board v. Cross
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 11, 1969No. 1 Div. 585PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
There is but one question presented by this appeal. Did the Mobile trial court err in fixing an attorney’s fee and assessing it as part of the costs against the appellant Mobile Housing Board in this eminent domain proceeding?
This proceeding began when the Mobile Housing Board, acting pursuant to applicable law, filed a condemnation petition in the Probate Court of Mobile County. The Probate Court granted the petition, commissioners were appointed, a hearing was held and the commissioners made their .awards. The Housing Board perfected its .appeal to the Circuit Court of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- South & North Alabama Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Randolph v. Builders & Painters Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Rogers v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Gano v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Street v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- White v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- E.H.G. v. E.R.G.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- City of Brewton v. White's Auto Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- State Bd. of Health v. Greater Birmingham Ass'n of Home Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.