Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and the State Correctional Institute at Waymart (SCI-Waymart) (collectively, Employer) petition for review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) order affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting Lynda Cantarella’s (Claimant) claim petition for workers’ compensation benefits because she was totally disabled *861as a result of abnormal working conditions that caused post-traumatic stress disorder.

Claimant worked for Employer as a food service instructor. Because part of her job duties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. US Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. C. Hannah & Sons Construction v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cantarella v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Heath v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. McLaurin v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. PA Liquor Control Board v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Cantarella v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API