Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and the State Correctional Institute at Waymart (SCI-Waymart) (collectively, Employer) petition for review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) order affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting Lynda Cantarella’s (Claimant) claim petition for workers’ compensation benefits because she was totally disabled *861as a result of abnormal working conditions that caused post-traumatic stress disorder.
Claimant worked for Employer as a food service instructor. Because part of her job duties…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- City of Philadelphia v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- US Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- C. Hannah & Sons Construction v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cantarella v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Heath v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- McLaurin v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- PA Liquor Control Board v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Cantarella v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.