McLaurin v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
Craig McLaurin seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board’s order that affirmed denial of McLaurin’s claim petition. He argues that the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) findings are not supported by substantial evidence and that the WCJ committed an error of law by concluding that his psychological injury was not caused by an abnormal work condition.
On October 9, 2006, McLaurin had been employed by Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) for six months as a bus driver with a set route in West Philadelphia. On that date, several…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- RAG (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, L.P. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Hershey Chocolate Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- City of Philadelphia v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pa Liquor Control Board v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- PA Liquor Control Board v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- BARTA v. L. Katzenmoyer (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- PA Liquor Control Board v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- S. Russo v. Upper Darby Twp. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025