Legal Opinion

Cantarella v. Department of Corrections

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 2003PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Lynda Cantarella (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Secretary of the Department of Corrections (Department) adopting the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of a Hearing Examiner and denying Act 6321 benefits to Claimant.

*872Claimant worked for the Department as a food service instructor at the State Correctional Institute — Waymart (SCI-Way-mart). Because part of her job duties required her to instruct inmates on how to perform certain tasks and assign them various job duties, at times she was alone with inmates in the dining room. On April…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. US Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. LoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Schanz v. Bureau of CorrectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PerfettoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Cohen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Murphy v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API