Legal Opinion
Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 10, 1997No. Slip Op. 97-127; Court 95-08-01024PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge.
On November 14, 1996, this court remanded the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s two letter rulings in Stainless Steel Plate from Sweden. 1 Bohler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United States, 946 F.Supp. 1003, 1004 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1996). The letter rulings reversed the Treasury Department’s 1976 post-finding scope ruling and held that two grades of stainless steel plate sold by plaintiff Bóhler-Uddeholm Corporation under the trade names UHB Stavax (“Stavax”) and UHB Ramax (“Ramax”) were within the scope of the 1973 antidumping finding issued in Stainless…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Kyowa Gas Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Alsthom Atlantique and Cogenel, Inc. v. The United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998