Faidley v. Emrich
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This is an action to quiet title to a mineral interest. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.
The amended petition alleged the ownership by plaintiff of a described quarter section; that defendants claimed some title to it, which was inferior to the plaintiff’s title; that W. C. Emrich claimed some interest in it because of a mineral deed duly recorded, such deed having been executed by plaintiff on December 13, 1943; that at the time of execution of the deed plaintiff was unfamiliar with the oil business and the difference…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Etenburn v. NearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Gates v. Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Converse v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mingenback v. MingenbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Stratton v. Wood Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Mingenback v. MingenbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954