Legal Opinion

Faidley v. Emrich

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1950No. 37,871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action to quiet title to a mineral interest. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.

The amended petition alleged the ownership by plaintiff of a described quarter section; that defendants claimed some title to it, which was inferior to the plaintiff’s title; that W. C. Emrich claimed some interest in it because of a mineral deed duly recorded, such deed having been executed by plaintiff on December 13, 1943; that at the time of execution of the deed plaintiff was unfamiliar with the oil business and the difference…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Etenburn v. NearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Gates v. Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Converse v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mingenback v. MingenbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Stratton v. Wood Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. Mingenback v. MingenbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API