Legal Opinion

Etenburn v. Neary

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 25, 1919No. 10183PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Jno. W. Hayson, Judge. Action by Sarah Etenbum against George W. Neary and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county. The plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, commenced this action against the defendant in error, as defendant below, to recover the possession of the tract of land in controversy, for three years’ rents, for the cancellation of certain conveyances, and for further damages, amounting in all to the sum of $6,000.00, charging a conspiracy between the defendants, and for fraud and deceit.

The plaintiff’s petition was filed on May 5. 1917. The cause was tried to the court and jury on the 2nd day of November, 1917, and at the conclusion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Oakland v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Williams v. AllisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Penny v. VoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Billy v. Le Flore County Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. In Re Cherokee Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Lakey v. North McAlester Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Sapulpa Petroleum Co. v. McCraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API