Legal Opinion
Matarazzo v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1976No. 73-C-545PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
This is a motion pursuant to Rule 15 Fed.R.Civ.P. for leave to file an amended complaint in order to (1) allege facts with greater specificity with respect to claims against the defendant, and at the same *558time to (2) add a pendent common law claim arising out of the same acts, practices and course of conduct. The essence of the original complaint is set forth in the class action determination decided on February 14, 1974, Matarazzo v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp., 62 F.R.D. 65 (E.D.N.Y.1974).
Defendant Friendly Ice Cream Corp. (Friendly) is a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Susser v. Carvel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bernard Susser v. Carvel Corporation, Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores, Inc., Carvel Stores Realty Corporation, and Eight Other CasesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lobdell v. Sugar 'N Spice, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Assam v. Deer Park Spring Water, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Dow Corning Corp. v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1978
- Angel Music, Inc. v. ABC Sports, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.