Legal Opinion
Dow Corning Corp. v. General Electric Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided November 14, 1978No. 78-CV-190PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
JAMES T. FOLEY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Dow Corning Corporation, has moved to file and serve a second amended complaint upon the defendant, General Electric Company (GE), pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.Pro. This is an action for patent infringement, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.; and, was commenced by the filing of a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on September 15, 1977. Defendant, GE, successfully moved for the transfer of the action to the Northern District of New York in March 1978.
Presently…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- The Troxel Manufacturing Company, and Cross-Appellee v. Schwinn Bicycle Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Christophides v. PorcoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Psg Co., a Corporation, and Philip S. Greenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Church of Scientology of California v. SiegelmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin LauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Campbell IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1985
- Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982