Legal Opinion
Claim of Rutledge v. Al. G. Kelly & Miller Bros. Circus
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
These two cases, argued together, occupy a common ground to test the jurisdiction of the New York Workmen’s Compensation Board where employment stems from another State hut where work is carried on in New York and the accident occurs here.
They involve, too, a consideration of the effect of Matter of Nashko v. Standard Water Proofing Co. (4 N Y 2d 199) on such a New York accident as well as the modified influence of the rule of Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Constr. Co. (252 N. Y. 394).
In Rhodes v. Mushroom Transp. the claimant is a resident of Pennsylvania; the employer a Pennsylvania corporation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Claim of Lewis v. Knappen Tippetts Abbett Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Matter of Amaxis v. N.A. Vassilaros, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Claim of Bauss v. Consolidated Chimney Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- International Paper Company v. TidwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Rogers v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1988
- Claim of Edick v. Transcontinental Refrigerated Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Stacy v. Matthew Bender Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Claim of Rayford v. National Union of Hospital & Nursing Home EmployeesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.