International Paper Company v. Tidwell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Two questions are presented on this appeal. The first is whether the Arkansas Workmen’s Compensation Commission has jurisdiction of this claim—or more properly stated, whether the Arkansas Workmen’s Compensation Law can be applied. The second is whether the claimant Tidwell has suffered a compensable injury. The commission held against appellant on both points. There has been no determination that appellee has suffered a permanent disability resulting from accidental injuries. This matter was reserved until the commission hears additional evidence as to the end of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Gould's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Pierce v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Aluminum Co. of America v. HenningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Brower Manufacturing Co. v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Arkansas Vinegar Co. v. AshbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Crain Burton Ford Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- International Paper Company v. McGooganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.