Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 21, 1988No. 86-CV-1061PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
CHOLAKIS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Peter Rogers and his wife Karen seek compensatory damages for personal injuries sustained while he was employed by defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail). On July 25, 1986, plaintiff was a freight conductor on a Conrail train which departed from Massena, New York en route to Quebec, Canada. Plaintiff alleges that Conrail neglected to adhere to safety rules and regulations concerning his right to stop working for the purpose of eating a meal. As a result of Conrail’s alleged failure to maintain safe working conditions…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peter J. Rogers and Karen Rogers v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Ronald Ward v. Soo Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Reidelbach v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
- Fogg v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Priestman v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.District Court, D. Maine · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.