Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Weingart

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1928No. Docket No. 3510PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for the death of his wife through the negligence of defendant. The case was tried before the court, and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff. The appeal is taken, under the “alternative method,” from said judgment.

For some time prior to March 2, 1924, the decedent had been a duly registered guest at a hotel in Los Angeles, then operated and leased by Ben Weingart, sole appellant herein. As such guest she occupied a room on the fourth floor of the hotel. Plaintiff was her husband, and while he did not live at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People v. Tom WooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Gjurich v. FiegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Payne v. R. H. White Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Hill v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Devens v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. West Coast Life Insurance v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API