Legal Opinion

West Coast Life Insurance v. Crawford

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1943No. Civ. 13789PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem.

The plaintiff in these three consolidated cases appeals from a judgment providing not only that it take nothing by virtue of its endeavor to rescind five life and accident insurance policies, but that, in its role as cross-defendant, it should pay the sums set forth in the policies it had sought to have cancelled. We have reached the conclusion that the judgment should be reversed because of the rejection of an exhibit important to the proof of plaintiff’s cases and to its defense against the cross-actions brought upon the policies.

In each of the three consolidated actions…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Johnston v. Metropolitan Life Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Beck v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Markley v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hubbard v. DaBellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API