Legal Opinion
Plum v. City of Healdsburg
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1965No. Civ. 22316PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
This is an appeal by the City of Healdsburg (hereinafter referred to as the “City”), its Building Inspector (hereinafter referred to as the “Inspector”), and the five members of its City Council (hereinafter referred to as the “Council”) from the judgment of the trial court ordering that a writ of mandate be issued to compel the Inspector to issue a building permit to respondents, William and Vera Plum.
In their verified petition for writ of mandate respondents alleged essentially as follows: That they are the owners of a parcel of real property situated in Healdsburg; that at all times…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Chavez v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Darrah v. California State Automobile Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- City and County of San Francisco v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Douglas v. JanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. AlcivarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.