City San Franciso v. Kiernan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
VAnciabf, C.
— Action to condemn land for the purpose of widening Mission Street in the city and county of San Francisco, in which judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff. Six of the nine defendants have appealed from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The action was commenced April 1, 1890, and the complaint conforms to the act of March 6, 1889, entitled “An act to provide for laying out, opening, extending, widening . . . . any street .... within municipalities, and to condemn and acquire any and all land and property necessary or convenient for that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davies v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Santa Cruz v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Knowles v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Ex parte SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- County of Merced v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Santa Ana v. HarlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Saratoga v. HinzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Mardis v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- City of Alameda v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.