Legal Opinion
Munzer v. Swedish American Line
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 21, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss an amended complaint on the grounds that (1) it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and (2) that it appears on the face of the summons and the amended complaint that the action is barred by the statute of limitations.
The complaint alleges that on or about January 28th, 1932, plaintiff purchased a ticket entitling her to passage on defendant’s vessel, the “Kungsholm” and that on or about Februaryf 12th, 1932, while she was a passenger on the vessel, “without any provocation by the plaintiff or just cause therefor and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Wurster v. . ArmfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Scallon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Chilford v. Central City Cold Storage Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Marine Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Cary v. HardyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1940
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Morman v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1967
- Giesy v. American Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.