Legal Opinion
Cole Energy Development Co. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided February 9, 1988No. 86-3003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLS, District Judge:
Partial summary judgment allowed.
Here are the facts.
Cole Energy Development Company (“Cole Energy”) leased two gas compressor units from Ingersoll-Rand Company (“Ingersoll-Rand”) for use in its business of developing gas fields and in the pumping, selling, and distribution of natural gas. A lease agreement for an ESH gas compressor was entered into by the parties on December 5, 1983, and a lease agreement for a KOA gas compressor was entered into by the parties on August 11, 1984. The terms and conditions of both agreements are identical. (Hence, when we refer to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Canal Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Ritchie Enterprises v. Honeywell Bull, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- McKernan v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Cole Energy Development Company, a Corporation v. Ingersoll-Rand Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Arias/root Engineering D/B/A Ar, Incorporated v. Cincinnati Milacron Marketing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.