Legal Opinion
McKernan v. United Technologies Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 10, 1989No. Civ. H-87-495(AHN)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NEVAS, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Peter and Shirley McKer-nan, doing business as Gemini Helicopters (“Gemini”), bring this diversity action against United Technologies Corporation, Sikorsky Aircraft Division (“Sikorsky”), and General Motors Corporation, Allison Gas Turbine Division (“Allison”). The complaint is cast in two counts, the first alleging breach of warranty and the second negligence. Allison has moved for summary judgment on the breach of warranty count. Both Allison and Sikorsky seek summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ cause of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
- Arcata Graphics Co. v. Heidelberg Harris, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- Lamontagne v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- International Financial Services, Inc. v. FranzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.