Legal Opinion
Arias/root Engineering D/B/A Ar, Incorporated v. Cincinnati Milacron Marketing Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1991No. 90-55661UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
945 F.2d 408
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
ARIAS/ROOT ENGINEERING d/b/a AR, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CINCINNATI MILACRON MARKETING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-55661.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 6, 1991.
Decided Sept. 25, 1991.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie Kirkland, Debtors. Security Pacific National Bank v. Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- S. M. Wilson & Company v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bae Systems Information & Electronics Systems Integration, Inc. v. Spacekey Components, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Tokyo Ohka Kogyo America, Inc. v. Huntsman Propylene Oxide LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- BAE Sys. Info. v. SpaceKey ComponentsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013