Legal Opinion

In Re Cipro Cases I and II

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 2004No. D043543PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AARON, J.

Petitioners Bayer Corporation, Barr Laboratories, Inc., The Rugby Group, Inc., Watson Pharmaceutics, Inc., and Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., seek a writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate its order granting class certification in a coordinated proceeding against them for alleged violations of the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16720 et seq.), the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.), and the common law. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in certifying the class. We nevertheless grant relief because the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Vioxx Class CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. In Re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Lit.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
  3. In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. In re Cipro Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API