In re Cipro Cases I & II
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
To protect competition in the marketplace, antitrust law prohibits agreements that create or perpetuate monopolies. Patent law, in contrast, grants temporary monopolies to inventors to encourage the development of useful innovations. We consider here a crucial question at the intersection of these two bodies of law: What limits, if any, does antitrust law place on the ability of a patent holder to make agreements restricting competition during the life of its patent? In particular, when another entity tries to invalidate a patent and enter the marketplace, can the patentee…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- In Re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Salveson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.