Legal Opinion
Reef v. Mills Novelty Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1936No. 6491PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
This suit was brought by Fred A. Reef against the Mills Novelty Company, on a claim alleged to have been assigned to him by B. B. Moseley. The case was tried before the eourt without a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of the Novelty Company. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 57 S. W. (2d) 242.
The material facts are substantially as follows:
During the year 1926, and for sometime afterwards, Moseley was in the employ of the Novelty Company as salesman of products of the company,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cleveland & Cameron v. HeidenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Lakeview Land Co. v. San Antonio Traction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
- Tabler, Crudup & Co. v. Sheffiield Land, Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Barringer v. Bes Line Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Reef v. Mills Novelty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
3Cited by38 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Johnson v. Structured Asset Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- Indemnity Insurance v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
- Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.