Legal Opinion
Reef v. Mills Novelty Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 2, 1933No. 2778PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTHALL, Justice.
In this case Fred A. Reef, plaintiff in error, sued to have an accounting with Mills Novelty Company, defendant in error, and B. B. Moseley, and judgment for the amount found due. Moseley made no answer, the case went to trial as to Reef and Mills Novelty Company.
The case was submitted and tried in the district court upon an agreed statement of facts as between Fred A. Reef, plaintiff in error, and Mills Novelty Company, defendant in error, the only parties to this appeal.
The agreed státement is as follows:
“We, Fred A. Reef, plaintiff, and Mills Novelty Company, defendant in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Portuguese-American Bank of San Francisco v. WellesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mueller v. Northwestern UniversityIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- City of Omaha v. Standard Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Tabler, Crudup & Co. v. Sheffiield Land, Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reef v. Mills Novelty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. QuaidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936