Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Haggard

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 2004No. CA 03-879Published

1Opinion of the Court

184 S.W.3d 479 (2004)

87 Ark. App. 75

Mark B. BEATTY and Patsy D. Beatty

v.

James G. HAGGARD and Sarah Haggard.

No. CA 03-879.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions III and IV.

June 16, 2004.

James F. Lane, P.A., Conway, AR, for Appellants.

Graddy & Adkisson, P.A., by: William C. Adkisson, Conway, AR, for Appellees.

ANDREE LAYTON ROAF, Judge.

Appellants Mark and Patsy Beatty brought an action for rescission of a real-estate contract against appellees James and Sarah Haggard based on constructive fraud. The Beattys appeal from the trial court's decision that they failed to prove either actual or…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lane v. RachelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. FARM BUREAU POLICY HOLDERS v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Clay v. BrandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Knight v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Roach v. Concord Boat Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API