Legal Opinion

Lane v. Rachel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 1965No. 5-3553PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

Appellants brought this action to rescind a sales contract, cancel a deed, a note, and a mortgage, and for the recovery from appellees of the amount paid on the purchase of a dwelling. The house was sold to appellants by the builder and owner, appellee Marshall Rachel, through his agents, appellees Thomas and Carlisle. In the alternative, appellants sought damages in the amount of $14,000.00. The appellants alleged that appellee Rachel was grossly negligent in the construction of the house and that the appellees made deceitful and fraudulent representations in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fausett & Co. v. BullardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Levinson v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Stewart v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Kotz v. RushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. Maurice v. ChaffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Vanderboom v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. South County, Inc. v. First Western Loan Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Grendell v. KiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Miskimins v. City National Bank of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API