Knight v. Day
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
W.H. “Dub” ARNOLD, Chief Justice.
The issue in this appeal is whether the appellee committee constructive fraud by allegedly engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. The trial court found no fraud. We agree with the trial court and hereby affirm.
The facts of the case are as follows. Appellants had hired appellee William Day to perform accounting services. Appellant Mary Knight, a licensed clinical social worker (L.C.S.W.), had started her own business entitled Knight Counseling, Inc. Ms. Knight was in the process of obtaining a contract with the State and needed to obtain a legal business…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. EllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- FARM BUREAU POLICY HOLDERS v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- RLI Insurance v. CoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Scollard v. ScollardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
3Cited by28 opinions
- Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- American Abstract and Title Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Born v. Hosto & Buchan, PLLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Beatty v. HaggardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Adams v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.