Legal Opinion

Clay v. Brand

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 4, 1963No. 5-2911PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

This is ail action to rescind a written contract of sale. By said contract, the appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Brand, purchased from the appellant, Mrs. Clay, a tourist court (Wedgewood) which is located south of Mountainburg, Arkansas. As the basis for rescission, the appellees allege that appellant fraudulently misrepresented to them the adequacy of the water supply and sewage system at the Court. The appellees claim that they reasonably relied upon appellant’s assurances of adequacy. Appellant denies making any such representations and asserts the water supply and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Fausett & Co. v. BullardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Mitchell Manufacturing Co. v. KempnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Hunt v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  5. Massey v. TyraSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ray Dodge, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Ackmann v. Keeney-Toelle Real Estate CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Beatty v. HaggardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Nicholson v. Century 21, Ivy Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Hamid Yazdianpour v. Safeblood Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API