Legal Opinion

Muhammad Chaudhry v. Michael Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2012No. 11-35072PublishedCited by 355 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Muhammad Chaudhry (Chaudhry) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Commissioner). Chaudhry argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in finding that Chaudhry is not disabled as defined in the Social Security Act (Act). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Chaudhry was thirty-two years old when he allegedly became disabled in 2005. Chaudhry had earned a general college degree in his native Pakistan,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Bray v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Vasquez v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by355 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Brenda L. v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Morales v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
  4. Schultz v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Williams v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

350 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API