Legal Opinion
Puffer v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 15, 2009No. 04 C 5764PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1
SIDNEY I. SCHENKIER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Katherine Puffer (“plaintiff’ or “Ms. Puffer”) filed this suit on behalf of herself and a putative class alleging that Allstate Insur-*455anee Company (“Allstate”) has carried out a nationwide pattern or practice of sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 206 and 207 (doc # 13: Am. Compl. at 11-12, 14). Plaintiff has moved to certify the following class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and (3): “All…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Campbell v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Brand v. Comcast Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Streeter v. Sheriff of Cook CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Puffer v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Bazile v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.