Legal Opinion
Brand v. Comcast Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 5, 2014No. Case No. 11 C 8471PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*207 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge:
James Brand and eleven others, on behalf of a putative class of African-American employees employed at the South Side Chicago facility of defendant Comcast Corporation, Inc., filed suit against Comcast, alleging discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiffs have also moved to certify their putative class. Plaintiffs and Comcast have each filed motions to strike or bar the declarations, reports, and testimony of witnesses for the opposing party. For the reasons stated below, the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Holmes v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Balschmiter v. TD Auto Finance LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Kristina Rapuano et al. v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Sellars v. CRST Expedited, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2017
- Brown v. Cook CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.