Legal Opinion

Pure Mint Co. v. La Barre

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 6, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant's bill seeks injunction against the police authorities of the city of Trenton to restrain them from seizing and confiscating certain machines owned by complainant and leased to various retail merchants in Trenton. In addition to the affidavits, one of the machines and its operation was demonstrated to the court, by consent of counsel on both sides.

The machine in question, known as "Jennings Legal Mint Salesman," is an ingeniously conceived variation of the usual automatic vending machine. Upon the deposit of a nickel in the slot and the operation of a lever, the machine discharges…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Zaft v. MiltonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Igoe v. JoyntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. S. R. Amusement Corp. v. QuinnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  5. Higgins v. KrogmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API