Legal Opinion
In Re Midland United Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 13, 1946No. 1073PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The court is required to determine reasonable but adequate compensation for trustees, committee members and certain other individuals in the proceedings for reorganization of Midland United Company (United) and Midland Utilities Company (Utilities), Delaware corporations and registered holding companies. The court obtained jurisdiction of both corporations originally under the provisions of Sextion 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207, in 1934. The provisions of Chapter X, 11 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq., have been made applicable to the proceedings insofar as is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- In Re Mountain States Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Otis & Co. v. Insurance Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wolf v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- The Official Creditors' Committee of Fox Markets, Inc. v. Walter Ely and Stuart L. KadisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. New Hampshire (In Re Public Service Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1989
- In Re McGann Mfg. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- In Re Inland Gas CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.