Legal Opinion
Dadourian Export Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 5, 1961No. 313, Docket 26699PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEDINA, Circuit Judge.
On December 14, 1956, the United States through the New Cumberland General Depot of the United States Army, at New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, circulated, together with forms for bidding and General Sale Terms and *180Conditions, an invitation for bids upon 91 items of government surplus property, Among the items listed for sale were items 65 through 73, which were described in the bid forms in the following manner:
Description and Location “Item No. of Property Unit of Quantity Measure
65 to 73 Nets, Cargo, 20' x 40', Manila rope meshes 8" square frame 3% circ mesh rope, 3"…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- United States v. F. C. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- American Elastics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Flower City Painting Contractors, Inc. v. Gumina Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Atlantic Life Ins. v. VaughanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Commodities Recovery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Price v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Harry Thuresson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.