Harry Thuresson, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtCoweN, Chief Judge
This is an action for breach of contract arising out of a sale of surplus property by the Department of Defense. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. We have concluded that the Government breached the guarantee provisions of the contract, and that plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount to be determined in a proceeding pursuant to Buie 131 (c).
The United States Air Force constructed and operated a large facility at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, at which it developed and processed photographs taken by reconnaissance aircraft. The operation of this facility generated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Wegematic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Saul Freedman, D/B/A M. & E. Equipment & Parts Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Aircraft Associates & Mfg. Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Freedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Kolar, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- John C. Kohler Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Commodities Recovery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.