Legal Opinion

Harry Thuresson, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 21, 1972No. 198-70PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoweN, Chief Judge

This is an action for breach of contract arising out of a sale of surplus property by the Department of Defense. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. We have concluded that the Government breached the guarantee provisions of the contract, and that plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount to be determined in a proceeding pursuant to Buie 131 (c).

The United States Air Force constructed and operated a large facility at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, at which it developed and processed photographs taken by reconnaissance aircraft. The operation of this facility generated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Wegematic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Saul Freedman, D/B/A M. & E. Equipment & Parts Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Aircraft Associates & Mfg. Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. Freedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Kolar, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. John C. Kohler Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Commodities Recovery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  5. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API