Legal Opinion

Minigan v. Irvin

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 18, 1997No. 1:95-cv-00099PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct any and all further proceedings in this case, including entry of final judgment, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Plaintiff and defendants have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion is denied, and defendants’ motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

On November 3, 1994, while he was confined at the Wende Correctional Facility maintained by the New York State Department of Correctional…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farid v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
  2. Marria v. BroaddusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Robinson v. HarderDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
  4. Waters v. JacobsenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API