Legal Opinion
Farid v. Goord
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 9, 2002No. 1:96-cv-00737PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. INTRODUCTION
CURTIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mujahid Farid commenced this action, pro se, while in custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), at the Attica Correctional Facility (“Attica”). Farid brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, claiming violations of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. On August 4, 1998, the court assigned Mark C. Poloncarz, Esq., to act as attorney for Farid. Item 48. 1
Defendants previously moved for summary judgment. Item 19. That motion was denied as premature. Item 52. The court ordered the parties to conduct…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rivera v. FischerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Allah v. PooleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Rosales v. KikendallDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Liner v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Barnes v. HendersonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.