Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Charneski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1962PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

Apparently deterred by the holding in New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Simpson (1941), 238 Wis. 550, 300 N. W. 367, that an automobile liability insurer cannot have declaratory judgment to determine insurance coverage involving an automobile accident in advance of the determination of the alleged insured’s liability on the negligence issue, the appellant, being a foreign corporation, sought such relief under the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act (28 USCA, p. 412, sec. 2201) on the jurisdictional ground of diversity of citizenship. Such choice of forums was not without merit and encouragement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Sahloff v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Mowry v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BurchardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API