St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Burchard
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Four issues are presented on this appeal:
1. Was there credible evidence to support the jury finding that LaVerne Kiefer was not negligent?
2. Did remarks made by Burchard’s counsel during his closing argument constitute reversible error?
3. Did the trial court err in submitting special-verdict questions?
4. Did the trial court err in denying Badger Mutual’s motion for a separate trial on the question of its policy defense?
Guest’s Negligence.
As to the first issue, appellant contends that Kiefer was negligent as a matter of law in riding with a driver who had been drinking, in respect to lookout,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Ritterbusch v. SexmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. CharneskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Teas v. EisenlordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Leverence v. United States Fidelity & GuarantyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Toulon v. NagleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.