Legal Opinion

Isbell-Hallmark Furniture Co. v. Sitz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 28, 1927No. 7 Div. 698PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOÜLDIN, J.

Code of 1907, § 3394, declared:

“All other' contracts for the conditional sale of personal property, by the terms of which the vendor retains the title until payment of the purchase money and the purchaser obtains possession * * * are, as to such condition, void against purchasers for a valuable consideration, mortgagees and judgment creditors without notice thereof, unless such contracts are in writing and recorded [etc.].” (Italics supplied.)

Under this statute the landlord’s lien upon the goods of the tenant of a dwelling or storehouse, given by Code of 1997, § 4747 (Code of 1923,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alford v. Singer Sewing MacH. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Hargrave v. Davis-Hunt Cotton CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Brunswick-Balke Collender Co. v. StarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Ex Parte AlfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Brooks v. DialSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Rue v. Loveman, Joseph & LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Isbell-Hallmark Furniture Co. v. SitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Wells v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API