Legal Opinion

Isbell-Hallmark Furniture Co. v. Sitz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 25, 1927No. 7 Div. 784PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, X

In Isbell-Hallmark Furniture Co. v. Frank Sitz, 114 So. 677, 1 we considered the effect of the amendment appearing-in Code, § 6898, extending protection to “landlords with liens” against unrecorded conditional sale contracts. We held this amendment gives priority to landlords having liens under Code, § 8814. >

The question now presented for review is whether the superior lien of the landlord extends to the rent due and to become due for the entire term, or is limited to the rent accrued at the time the conditional sale contract is recorded and the landlord receives actual notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nolen v. FarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Scott v. RenfroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Isbell-Hallmark Furniture Co. v. SitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. La Rue v. Loveman, Joseph & LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Arbuthnot v. ThatcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Wells v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Gay v. RadneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Smith v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API