Legal Opinion

La Rue v. Loveman, Joseph & Loeb

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 25, 1929No. 6 Div. 336PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

In an action of detinue by a conditional vendor of personal property against a landlord who had a lien on the property, and had taken peaceable possession of it after the tenant (purchaser) had abandoned it, the Court of Appeals sustained the right of recovery by the vendor, assuming that there was no sufficient notice of the vendor’s conditional sale, either by recording the instrument or otherwise, upon the theory that because the landlord possessed only a lien, which had not ripened into a title, he could not resist the claim of the vendor, because he had no sufficient property right on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gafford v. StearnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  2. Gwin v. Emerald Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Snellgrove v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Bryan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  5. Seals v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Morris v. KaiserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Beavers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Hollingsworth v. CaseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Gay v. RadneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API