Brooks v. Dial

Appellant rented to one Britt Clark for the year 1922 certain lands for pasturage purposes only, and during that year procured the issuance of an attachment against Clark for the balance of the rent due, and levied on a mule that had been pasturing on said land. Sections 8894-8896, Code 1923; Engram v. Thoma, 101 So. 834, 212 Ala. 129; Blackman v. Engram (Ala. Sup.) 107 So. 741. W, O. Dial (appellee) interposed a claim to the mule, and upon the trial of the claim suit judgment was rendered before the court without a jury in favor of the claimant, from which the plaintiff in the attachment…