Legal Opinion
Zeis v. Fruehauf Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1972No. 153PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The trial court’s order for dismissal came more than five years after the action was commenced by the service of the summons and complaint. Sec. 269.25, Stats., provides that:
“Dismissal for delay. The court may with notice dismiss any action or proceeding which is not brought to trial within 4 years after its commencement.”
Sec. 270.54, Stats., also confers dismissal power upon trial courts. That statute provides in part:
“The court may also dismiss the complaint, with costs, in favor of one or more defendants in case of unreasonable neglect on the part of the plaintiff to serve the summons on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Latham v. Casey & King Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Lawrence v. MacIntyreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Taylor v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. DicksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Wisconsin Lumber & Supply Co. v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Marshall-Wisconsin Co. v. Juneau Square Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Rush v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Prahl v. BrosamleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Jacobson v. AvestruzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.