Latham v. Casey & King Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The appeal raises two questions: (1) Whether the trial court has the power to dismiss sua sponte an action on its merits upon failure of the plaintiff’s attorney to appear at the pretrial conference, and (2) if the court has such power, whether it was wrong for the court to exercise it in the manner it did. The rules of civil practice of the county courts of Milwaukee county require a pretrial conference in all civil jury actions and the attendance of trial attorneys. This rule, apparently adopted as a uniform requirement by Milwaukee county courts, supplements sec. 269.65, Stats., which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Schneck v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Smith v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Motowski v. People's Dentists of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Sheldon v. Nick & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Standard Theatres, Inc. v. State, Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Neylan v. VorwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Marshall-Wisconsin Co. v. Juneau Square Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Barland v. Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.